Please or Register to create posts and topics.

Identifying Earliest / Latest Datestamp Use

Why you need to work with the latest Datestamp data!

Sometimes the only way to get a general idea of when a datestamp was introduced or withdrawn is to record its earliest amd latest dates of use. I recently found two unrecorded Oudtshoorn postmarks which allowed me to claim (at this moment in time) possession of both the earliest and the latest dates of use. This 'discovery' came as something of a surprise as I had absolutely no reason to believe they had not been recorded before.

Today I had a similar experience, a somewhat unsatisfactory discovery that came in by email auction notification. There was a lesson in the experience, one that I had learned before and forgotten. The lesson is "always use the latest data when attempting to determine earliest and latest use of a datestamp!" Fail to do so and you end up embarrassing yourself. As I have done now on several occassion when using old records to report 'new' finds to Alex Visser which were nothing of the sort. (This should not stop you from trying!)

I spotted the item below on Kenny Napier's Edenvale auction. I had reason to call Bob Hill about another item that had come up on the Philatelic Friends auction site and mentioned this MAMRE 'skeleton' cancel to him.  I know that Bob has an interest in Skeleton cancellers but this is not as serious a collecting field for him as is Shipping Postmasters, Donald Campbell at Verneukpan, Apartheid, Cape Cork Cancellers and his Kit Kat display. (Sorry, that's an in-joke!). Bob has a good going on great Skeleton canceller collection, maybe 100 or so, but he is never very serious about the subject until I raise the spectre of acquiring his Simonstown Skeleton postmarks for my Simonstown display. Any suggestion by me that he should consider swapping or selling them to me to fill the hole  in my display - I've tried for years to find just a single scrappy postmark on piece - kindles in him a grim and stubborn passion for the subject. Anyway....

Back to Kenny Napier's MAMRE skeleton type canceller. The item is described as "South Africa card with lovely Mamre skeleton type cancel of 7 Apr 1927". Well, in my opinion, and Bob's (which counts for more), this is NOT a Skeleton canceller. It is an example of what Goldblatt calls the 'Circular Datestamp of 1885' of which he says "the distinctive feature of this datestamp is the dot at the bottom". In talking to Bob on the phone he whipped out his 20-year old copy of Frescura which is never far from his hands or the phone and advised me that Frescura calls this a "Single Circle with Dot 9 to 3 o clock". (Small dot variety.) Its earliest known use in Mamre is 2nd Jauary 1888 and the latest is 29th September 1925. However, when I emailed Alex Visser about my 'new' discovery, he advised me that in the latest copy of Frescura's book the last date of known use is 9th June 1927, some two months after Kenny Napier's example.

So, sadly, this item is not the latest recorded example. This is not the first time I have enthusiatically approached Alex with a new find only to be corrected by him. I am embarrassed to have wasted his time. Again! Nevertheless it is quite incredible how long this Cape colonial datestamp remained in Union use! And it is equally surprising where and how you can make new discoveries, even among the most reputable and knowledgeable dealers.


Uploaded files:
  • Mamre-SC-of-1885-Skeleton.jpg

Nice item, but I think Bob is right this is not a skeleton canceller. Skeleton postmarks were temporary rubber stamps (in cases I know with larger diameter circles) than the nominal one which was sent for repairs. They had shorter usages presumably because the normal postmark was repaired and returned. Cape of Good Hope/South African postmarks are difficult to pin latest dates of use, as many continued to be used well into the Union period, so if one is collecting Cape I think it is best to pin it at the start of the Union. Frescura was right to say that the ERD and LRD  are just indicative. They are moving targets. He classification method for circular cancellers resonated with me for its simplicity and I use it. Your example is SC.DOT  (Single circle with dot at bottom) the others are balnk at bottom, split name, CGH at bottom, Cape Colony at bottom etc). Easy to remember and sort. Double circles have an emblem, i.e., DC.Emblem, DC.Numeral and so on.  


Where to find the latest data on Datestamp usage

Postal history found in traditional print media publications is invariably disappointingly out-of-date as it is incapable of being updated short of a new revised book being published. It is also expensive because it costs a lot to print and update books. The early South African postal historians like Berry, Goldblatt and Putzel did not think to list first and last use of datestamps, probably because it is so much extra work. The first to do so in a serious academic way was Prof. Franco Frescura with his landmark 'The Post Offices of the Cape of Good Hope 1792-1910' in 2003.

This led other postal historians working in other areas to follow suit. The good news is that first and last dates of use is increasingly available for free on-line. Perhaps the most remarkable postal historian is Prof. Alex Visser who after collaborating with the dying Ralph Putzel created a free on-line Addendum to Ralph's and his work. Today, Alex's Addendum is roughly equal in size to Ralph's original work. However, it offers no data on first and last dates of use. Its usefulness is diminished by the fact that because it is an Addendum to a printed book ie. you have to own the books to get the full list of a town's recorded datestamps.

The PFSA has had the great good sense makes its reference section FREE on its website.  IMO, this is exactly how philately should work - free from the top down. The PFSA's site includes the most recently updated version of Alex's Addendum (which covers states, colonies, Union and Republic, etc., but without first and last date of use). This may never be included because there are now other lists like Cape of Good Hope (essentially Frescura's work), Orange Free State, German SWA, ZAR/Transvaal and Swaziland, that do list first and last dates of use. All are works in progress, some being more complete than others. For example, the OFS list is complete from A - Z but others are still working towards a conclusion. Those who make free use of their research should be grateful to them for their work. The way to show our appreciation is to diligently send them any new and unrecorded data as we find it.

You can see the electronic listing on the PFSA website:
Go to RESOURCES > POSTMARKS > then choose your area from the drop down menu.

Typically, you then select a section based on the first letter of the Town's name, like 'O' for Oudtshoorn, etc.

'Orange Free State - Its Post Offices and Their Markings - 1854 to 1910'
I enjoyed looking at the OFS reference which, to my shame, I did not know existed. Its correct title is 'Orange Free State - Its Post Offices and Their Markings - 1854 to 1910' (Kevin Price). I have a stack of OFS material in boxes that I still want to write-up. This comprehensive reference will help enormously in simpifying the process.

Below are two covers that I looked up in Kevin's on-line reference today. The top postcard is a new addition to my 'Cantonments' display. It is from TEMPE and is a good strike of a postmark that Kevin does not show as an example of the type, stating only that it is a variety, 'Type 660 (with the O.R.C. removed)'. The lower postcard  is from LADYBRAND. As it had been lying on my desk for a few days I idly looked it up. To my great surprise it is postmarked two weeks earlier than the OFS reference's earliest date of 29 Sep 09 for this datestamp. So, I sent it off to Kevin, the author/editor. He replied 'good catch!". You can do this too. It all helps.

Uploaded files:
  • TEMPE-ORC-removed-18-MAR-12.jpg
  • Ocean-PO-to-Ladybrand-ORC.jpg